Search results for " case-law"

showing 7 items of 7 documents

De la prohibición del terrorismo on-line : una reflexión constitucional

2021

The paper thinks out loud on the banning of the terrorist´s contents on the Internet, specifically within the international and national legal framework, with the interpretation given by the European Court´s of Human Right case-law and our Constitutional Court´s case-law.

:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]2070-8157 22082 Revista Boliviana de Derecho 584568 2021 32 8055236 De la prohibición del terrorismo on-line una reflexión constitucional Álvarez Rodríguezspecifically within the international and national legal frameworkInternetConstitutionUNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICASwith the interpretation given by the European Court´s of Human Right case-law and our Constitutional Court´s case-law. ConstituciónterrorismoterrorismIgnacio The paper thinks out loud on the banning of the terrorist´s contents on the InternetInternet 732 757
researchProduct

Convenzione europea dei diritti umani e problemi di costituzionalità della legge elettorale italiana

2013

By an order of 21 March 2013, the Court of Cassation referred to the Constitutional Court the question of constitutionality of the current Italian electoral law on the grounds that it runs counter to the constitutional principles of free and equal suffrage. The Constitutional Court has been called by the referring judge to focus on three main aspects of law: the closed list system; the majority bonus in the Chamber of Deputies, by which the coalition that wins the highest number of votes receives at least 55% of the seats; and the majority bonus in the Senate, which is assigned on a regional level. While the Court of Cassation affirmed that the constitutional principles on the right to vote…

Electoral Law – Constitutional Review – European Court of Human Rights Case-Law – Political Rights – Electoral Systems – Margin of Appreciation – Democracy.
researchProduct

Democrazia e partecipazione politica nella giurisprudenza della Corte di giustizia dell'Unione europea

2011

L'articolo si propone di verificare il ruolo che ha avuto il concetto di democrazia rappresentativa nella giurisprudenza della Corte di Giustizia. The articles examines the role that the concept of Representative Democracy has played in the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

European Union - Democracy - Democratic Theories - Representative Democracy - Case-Law of the Court of JusticeUnione europeaSettore IUS/13 - Diritto Internazionaledemocrazia - teorie democratiche - democrazia rappresentativa - Giurisprudenza della Corte di Giustizia
researchProduct

Authorities in Early Modern Law Courts

2021

This volume looks at the comparative development of legal practice in the early modern period across Europe. Focusing deliberately on the impact of law courts on substantive law – and not on its systematisation by learned jurists – it studies similarities and differences in the development of the law across different jurisdictions. In doing so it evaluates whether and to what extent it is possible to consider this development as a unitary and truly European phenomenon. This collection re-evaluates current debates surrounding the development of civil law in the early modern period in the context of the grand narratives of European legal history and sets out to challenge current orthodox view…

Settore IUS/19 - Storia Del Diritto Medievale E Modernolegal authorities case-law precedent
researchProduct

Il lavoro etero-organizzato prima e dopo il caso Foodora Italia.

2019

l contributo ripropone la discussione sull’esegesi della fattispecie disciplinata dall’art. 1 comma 2 del d. lgs. n. 81 del 2015 (nel testo anteriore alla riforma del 2019) trattata dall’autore nei Colloqui Giuridici sul Lavoro del 2015 (a cura) di Antonio Vallebona per il Massimario di Giurisprudenza del Lavoro. Lo studio rigettava la tesi che il lavoro organizzato dal committente fosse la terza fattispecie e anzi con riferimento delle condizioni di applicazio­ne dimostrava la necessità di una lettura includente. La conclusione era che la nuova disciplina aveva natura antifraudolenta e determinava un allargamento (relativo) dell’area della subordi­nazione conseguente alla riduzione del cam…

This article republishes (after the Italian Supreme Court judgement n.166/2020 on the Foodora Italia case) the contribution to the exegesis of the case brought by art. 1 para­graph 2 of the d. lgs. n. 81 of 2015 (in the text before the 2019 reform) delivered by the author in the 2015's "Colloqui Giuridici sul Lavoro" (edited) by Antonio Vallebona for the "Massimario di Giurisprudenza del Lavoro". The study rejected the thesis that the job organ­ised by the client was an intermediate regulation between the employee and the self-employed ones. Indeed regarding the conditions for its application it showed the need for extensive reading. The conclusion was that the new discipline was (and is) an anti-fraudulent one. It led to a (relative) expansion of the area ofsubordination as a consequence of a reduction in the scope of coordinated self-employed work. A little more than four years after that article the Italian Supreme Court (with the judgement n.166/2020) on the Foodora Italia case addresses for the first time the issue of the hetero-organised work (by art. 1 paragraph 2 of the d. lgs. n. 81 of 2015). The Supreme Court fully adheres to the paper's thesis. So in terms of the "re­medial" function of the standardthe nature of the organisation's specific conditionand eventually reducing the legal frame for coordinated work. The fact that the procedural matter dealt with the riders was (then and now is) utterly irrelevant for the correct interpretation of such a new provision. Giving to riders of the employee status is not an effect of the peculiarit­ies of the work through digital platforms. It is a consequence of the remedial nature of such a case-law.
researchProduct

Preface, Authorities in Early Modern Law Courts

2021

did the early-modern case law of higher courts across Europe have authority? If so, in what sense? This is the question that dominates the book, looking at many different early modern jurisdictions across Europe.

authorities case-law
researchProduct

Party autonomy regarding jurisdiction under the property regimes regulations

2021

The main accomplishment of the Property Regimes Regulations lies in their bringing more coherence into the cross-border family law adjudication. In the field of international jurisdiction, they strive to align the competence in couples? patrimony disputes to that in succession and in separation proceedings, or else to align the competence of the courts to the applicable law. These tendencies are clearly visible in the Regulations? provisions on choice of court agreements. Namely, the Regulations allow for such agreements, but severely limit parties? choice and the possible effects of these clauses. When succession or separation proceedings are pending, it is often only possible to institute…

party autonomy.registered couples? propertyit is often only possible to institute patrimonial disputes at the same court as the said proceedings. When proceedings concerning matrimonial or registered partners? property are initiated without previously pending succession or divorce proceedingshoweveror else to align the competence of the courts to the applicable law. These tendencies are clearly visible in the Regulations? provisions on choice of court agreements. Namelyanalogy with other EU regulations and the CJEU case-law can be of help. The critical eye of the doctrine isrégimen económico-matrimonialRegulation 1104/2016mainly cast on the unpredictable fate of the choice of court agreements under the Regulations. The paper analyses the complex regulation of the choice-ofcourt agreements in the Property Regimes Regulationsautonomía de parte. 274 291draws attention to open questions and provides possible answers. Choice-of-court agreementjurisdictionmatrimonial propertybut severely limit parties? choice and the possible effects of these clauses. When succession or separation proceedings are pendingthey strive to align the competence in couples? patrimony disputes to that in succession and in separation proceedings:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]parties can avail themselves of a fairly limited list of options to choose a court from. The Regulations leave several questions regarding choice of court agreements unanswered. Oftenjurisdicciónthe Regulations allow for such agreementsAcuerdo de elección del fororégimen de parejas registradasor else when the necessary consent to the joinder is not given2386-4567 22661 Actualidad jurídica iberoamericana 587897 2021 15 8113562 Party autonomy regarding jurisdiction under the property regimes regulations Kramberger ?kerlJerca The main accomplishment of the Property Regimes Regulations lies in their bringing more coherence into the cross-border family law adjudication. In the field of international jurisdictionReglamento 1103/2016UNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICASRegulation 1103/2016Reglamento 1104/2016
researchProduct